Okay, DC, you've certainly got us talking about the DC Universe with a passion that any owner of trademarked characters would envy. But there are some parts of the discussion you have to be wishing would just go away, and Graeme McMillan adds to that uncomfortable list at Newsarama.
The conflict is obvious: DC (quite reasonably) wants to have their cake and eat it too. Almost literally. They want to exploit their world-famous Iconic Characters without being tied to the 75 years of history that, well,
made them the Icons they are. This paradox isn't new to the September launch of what has come to be called DCnU.
Of course, in the Good Old Days, when they wanted to rewrite a character's history, they just rewrote it. Readership turned over every three to five years: Who noticed if Green Arrow had two origins? Who cared if Aquaman and Lori Lemaris couldn't possibly have come from the same Atlantis?
 |
| Troublemakers. |
Then Julius Schwartz and Gardner Fox decided that all this stuff actually happened, somewhere... well, it's comic books, none of it actually happened, but you know what I mean. And it takes someone with a special kind of attachment to his diversions to even comprehend the problem.
You young whippersnappers don't remember the tentative speculation. "If there's an Earth-2, and the Justice Society lives there... then is there a Superman there? If so, where's the cutoff point? Which stories happened to 'ours' and which happened to 'theirs'?"
McMillan logically observes that if the 2011 "soft reboot" has any reason to exist at all, then most if not all of the continuity fixes since, well,
ever "never happened". But DC can't afford to actually cut off their continuity and start over, and they
certainly can't afford for
you to believe they might.
DC's ongoing existence as a publisher depends on us readers
buying the stuff anyway,
at the very least as if nothing had happened, preferably in larger numbers. In order to continue exploiting their back catalog of material, they
can't cut it loose. Why would a reader who started reading with
Justice League #1 want to go back and buy this other stuff with the same name if it has nothing to do with the group he's reading now?
But you know, from an artistic point of view, that's exactly what they would
want to do. The characters are bound by so much continuity that it's difficult to tell new stories about them. If you're thinking of comparing comic book characters to beloved, iconic fictional characters in other media, consider: There are only 60 stories about Sherlock Holmes, 26 Tarzan books, and 12 James Bond novels. (And not once has there been a "Crisis on Infinite Baker Streets".)
Superman, by contrast, has appeared in over 900 issues of
Action, 700 issues of
Superman, and uncounted hundreds of stories in
World's Finest,
Adventures of Superman,
DC Comics Presents and dozens of other titles. Is it any wonder some of these stories begin to look alike?
Before the ink was wet on
Crisis on Infinite Earths #1, we were asking "which stories still matter." They never said then, and they're sure not going to say now. They can't afford for you to decide that "well, the introduction of
Mopee into the Flash series was the defining moment of the character, so if
that 'never happened' I'm never buying another Flash comic."
 |
| Even this guy has fans, you know. |
So if you're waiting for DC to tell you, up front, who the characters are and what their histories were, well, from their perspective that defeats the purpose.
 |
Guns, sharks and boobs falling out of a bustier.
We did everything we could possibly do to get you to pick the book up. |
Just shut up and buy the damn books. Or not.
LATER: Of course, I meant "Before the ink was DRY on Crisis on Infinite Earths #1..." Apologies to both of my readers.
